top of page

Relationships

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOAL ORIENTATION, ANXIETY, SELF-EFFICACY, AND LOGICAL DECISION MAKING

   This study examines the role of goal orientation in the self-regulatory and decision-making

 

processes of business students. 479 business students completed a survey assessing their

 

pattern of goal orientation, state anxiety, self-efficacy, as well as their decision-making style. The

 

importance of making logical decisions is a business necessity, yet little research has examined

 

the role of goal orientation and other variables in decision making. The purpose of this study was

 

to provide an initial test of the direct influence of orientation on key self-regulatory processes

 

and indirect effect on logical decision-making styles.

   Goal orientation has been one of the most widely studied and evolving constructs among

 

motivational researchers over the past three decades. This study contributes to the literature by

 

exploring the unique relationships of the four goal orientation dimensions, on self-efficacy, state

 

anxiety, and logical decision making. Mastery goals focus on an absolute, intrapersonal standard

 

and performance-goals focus on a normative standard. The approach to avoid distinction has

 

been prevalent in several motivational theories and suggests individuals adopt approach or avoid

 

tendencies that are related to competence.

   MPGO is characterized with an absolute intrapersonal competence with a predilection to

 

approach success. It involves a focus on enhancing none's task competence by developing new

 

skills. MPGO is associated with adaptive learning styles, such as deeper processing of task-

 

related information. MPGO involves an appetitive, interpersonal success standard with a

 

propensity to approach success. PPGO involves a focus on the positive outcome of attaining

 

favorable competency judgments relative to others. MPGO should be associated with an

 

incremental view of ability.

   PVGO involves a normative, interpersonal competence standard with a preference to avoid

 

failure. High PVGO has negative effects on self-set goals and actual performance. It is expected

 

that cognitive processes such as self-efficacy should be negatively related to mastery-avoid goals.

 

Task specific self-efficacy is an individual's belief that he or she has the capability to perform well

 

 on a task. MPGO and PPGO are two of the four goal orientation dimensions. Both state anxiety

 

and MVGO share the need to avoid failure. State anxiety is typically defined as test anxiety in

 

academic settings. MVGO should be negatively related to PPGO because it focuses attention on

 

the positive outcome.

  The study examined the role of decision-making, a critical organizational behavior that

 

contributes to effectiveness across several performance situations. Individuals must

 

demonstrate rational decision making by using rules and goal driven logic to reach their decision.

 

If individuals do not properly identify the problem, they are less likely to make decisions that will

 

lead to positive outcomes for the business. Self-efficacy and state anxiety play a key role in

 

predicting individuals' decision making, both directly and indirectly.

   Previous research has shown that arousal and anxiety influence cognitive processes and

 

performance. This study aims to expand on the literature that has found anxiety to negatively

 

influence decision-making. Managers are constantly called upon to make decisions to solve

 

problems. The effectiveness and quality of those decisions determine how successful a manager

 

will be. Decision making and problem solving are ongoing processes of evaluating situations,

 

considering alternatives, making choices, and following them up with actions.

 

 

Team 4: Topic 9 – Problem Identification, Resolution, and Decision Making

Work Cited

Radosevich, David J., and Michael B. Knight. “The Relationship between Goal Orientation, Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Logical Decision Making.” Journal of Business & Behavioral Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, Spring 2020, pp. 100–113. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=147492143&site=bsi-live.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Team 4. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page